Call me a prude, but I like the structure in The Elements of Style. I am very partial to strict rules (please don’t analyze me!). Since I like the book overall, there are many rules that I find helpful. My favorite rule is # 16 in An Approach to Style. This rule is well explained. I believe what Strunk and White were getting at is for writers to be specific. On the other hand, there is a fine line when it comes to this issue. #16 is always the rule I struggle with. Sometimes I forget to cite examples that will clarify exactly what I mean. And I have been in those situations where I would try and work out a sentence that sounded extremely awkward. Whenever I read this rule I don’t think that it’s vague. Somehow #16 clicks in my head and makes sense. The reason I need this rule is because I always need to be reminded that I can always clarify. I also like rule #17, Do not inject opinion. I normally write academic papers without injecting my opinion or the way I personally feel. The Invent Your Own Technology assignment felt wrong to me. I actually inserted a great deal of my personal opinion, but maybe the assignment called for this type of writing because it was mostly a reflection of my experiences. So audience also must be considered with this rule. Strunk and White makes clear that writing must have a purpose and if, “…you have received a letter inviting you to speak at the dedication of a new hospital, and you hate cats, your reply…does not have…to cover the full range of your emotions” (Strunk and White 80).
Headings in chapter III is written in a way that would help people that use typewriters. I feel like this rule is dated because of this. Stunk and White write, “On succeeding pages, begin near the top, but not so near as to give a crowded appearance” (Strunk and White 34). On computers, the headings are set in advance, so there is no need for me to manually adjust the headings unless it is for a particular reason. The sentence, “Leave a blank line, or its equivalent in space, after the heading” (Strunk and White 34).
In terms of what Strunk and White may look like, I always envision Sherlock Holmes and Watson; two very upper-crust white men. Strunk taught at Cornell in 1919, and because of this, I simply do not believe Strunk is a female. Ong discusses in A Technology that Restructures Thought the role of “diglossia” in language and on society. Strunk and White are in a position where they can make decisions about language and have those decisions change the way society feels about how English is spoken. Their stamp of approval or disapproval can inadvertently create biases against people that do not subscribe to their ways of thinking, in terms of language. It must be nice to have so much influence.